Battlefield Clearance and a Chinese revolt

Published on 14 May 2021
Submitted by Tony Spagnoly

“Private Smith, one of the ordnance men in our team, was killed tampering with a 106 fuse. Chinese now totally frightened of job and there is every possibility of their refusing to carry on until an inquiry is carried out.”

The above is a diary entry dated 21 November 1919, from Lt Frank Coxon (formerly of the 7th Royal Fusiliers) who was spending an inhospitable winter out on a lonely outpost on the site of the old Hindenburg Line at Bellicourt, close to the St Quentin Canal.

Frank Coxon Pictured In 1916.
Frank Coxon pictured in 1916.
The St Quentin Canal Shrouded In Mist.
The St Quentin Canal shrouded in mist.

In an article researched by WFA member Tony Spagnoly, we are informed that Coxon was in command of a small section of NCOs and 26 Chinese coolies engaged in the dangerous task of salvaging and defusing explosives from the old battlefields. We also learn that the death of Private Smith would result in the Chinese members of the team downing tools and refusing to work.

The fighting had been intense in the area that Coxon and his unit were based and the amount of ordnance his men were tasked with handling was shocking - after just four days on the job he recorded:

“Total defusing now up to 301 and we added a further 220 today by utilising the elevating gear of an old German minenwerfer we found in a nearby trench to act as a vice.”

Unexploded Shells Are Still A Common Find.
Unexploded shells are still a common find.

Equally disturbing is his description of the Heath Robinson-style methods involved in making a live 4.5 high explosive shell (of which he says there were “lots”) safe:

“1. Two benches of six men each. 2. Hammer and chisel operator for removing punch dabs. 3. His assistant to hold shell. 4. Hammer key operator to start the fuse. 5. Another assistant to hold the shell. 6. Another man to place same in basket... carefully!”

Members Of A Chinese Labour Team Who Were Working In The Ypres Sector In 1919.
Members of a Chinese labour team who were working in the Ypres sector in 1919.

In a letter to his mother three days after the fatality, Coxon wrote:

“I am sorry to have kept you all for so long without a letter but I have had big trouble here recently. Well, last Friday (21 November) I had a man killed on the job - not through the process of defusing, which is quite a safe procedure, but because he tried to take a 106 fuse to pieces and it went off in his hand.

“No need to go into details mother but his injures were terrible and as there is no medical assistance nearer than Roisel - 15 kilometres away - the poor man died in half an hour. No wonder the Chinese were terrified and work has stopped. I could only bandage the poor man and exhausted every means trying to get an ambulance along these awful roads but failed. The nearest decent telephone was several miles away. We could do nothing to save him. The ambulance finally got here at 10pm to take poor Smith away. He will be buried at Roisel tomorrow.

“So you see, the Great War still claims its victims.”

The timing of the tragedy could not have been worse for Coxon, who had recorded in his diary in the days immediately prior to the death that his Chinese crew were becoming “very discontented”.

Heavy snowstorms had added to pre-existing delays to the arrival of warm rations, which was resulting in “growling”, and on 19 November Coxon penned:

“Chinese very insubordinate owing to shortage of food and I sense trouble. I notice all fresh water for the Chinese Labour Corps, Battlefield Salvage and Graves teams brought to us by an officer as the one driver available became a casualty on the old battlefield.”

Deaths were clearly not uncommon, but the fatality among a member of their own team resulted in the Chinese downing tools - leaving Coxon with no choice but to suspend all work. In a bid to try and head-off a full-scale revolt, he made a report out to Captain Wicks, the Deputy Assistant Director of Ordnance Supply at La Chapellette, and asked him to come and address his team “at once”.

Wicks arrived on 23 November and Coxon got an assurance that no more work would be done by his team until the No. 58 Casualty Clearing Station could be organised to offer proper medical arrangements in the case of any further accidents. In a bid to close the chapter, Private Smith was “buried very quickly”(the next day) in the temporary British cemetery at Roisel.

The Roisel Communal Cemetery Extension. Private ‘Smith’ (Presumed To Be A Pseudonym) Was Said By Coxon To Have Been Buried Here.
The Roisel Communal Cemetery Extension. Private ‘Smith’ (presumed to be a pseudonym) was said by Coxon to have been buried here.

Coxon claimed that the accident had been Smith’s own fault for tampering with a fuse, but he added in his diary that the Chinese were

“having none of it and refused to proceed”.

He continued:

“Owing to this, I learnt from Colonel Turner of 57 Labour Company that white personnel might be provided. Chinese now employed around the camp in general tidying operations. Military Police employed at night to secure the camp.”

A full-scale revolt does appear to have been avoided and Coxon, who had seen action during the conflict itself, would finally be demobbed in January 1920 and live for a further 55 years.

It would be several years after Coxon and the Chinese coolies had left before restrictions were lifted in many of the worst hit areas of the Western Front and the civilian populations allowed to return.

A Headstone Of One Of The Officers Of The CLC. This Is At Les Baraques Military Cemetery
A headstone of one of the officers of the CLC. This is at Les Baraques Military Cemetery

There are no records of a Private Smith in Roisel cemetery or of a man with such a name having died in November 1919. It is assumed that Coxon gave the man the pseudonym ‘Smith’ to protect his identity – probably as he was accusing him of having been responsible for his own death.

This article first appeared in Bulletin 57, in June 2000. Bulletin is one of several magazines available for free to members of The WFA. If you want to see more articles like this one, you may wish to become a member of The Western Front Association.

To learn more about the Chinese Labour Corps, watch the video: The Chinese Labour Corps on the Western Front by Wenlan Peng

Key benefits of membership

Becoming a member of The Western Front Association (WFA) offers a wealth of resources and opportunities for those passionate about the history of the First World War. Here's just three of the benefits we offer:

Bulletin Magazine Icon
Bulletin Magazine

This magazine provides updates on WW1 related news, WFA activities and events.

Virtual Battlefield Tours Icon
Virtual battlefield tours

Access online tours of significant WWI sites, providing immense learning experience.

Podcasts Ebinars Icon
Podcasts

Listen to over 300 episodes of the "Mentioned in Dispatches" podcast.

Other Articles

1.25Th Cyclists
5 December 2025

From Putney Bridge to Jallianwala Bagh: The 1/25th County of London Cyclists 1914-1919

Read more
Ludendorff Offensive 1918
28 November 2025

Revisiting the Ludendorff Offensives, March-July 1918

Read more
Whicker Thumb Ypres
22 November 2025

Alan Whicker meets the ‘merry mass of men’ returning to Ypres in 1961

Read more
Seaplane Hadaway
19 November 2025

More than just Gallipoli: Naval operations in the Eastern Mediterranean 1914-16

Read more
Picture9
11 November 2025

The Fijian Labour Corps

Read more